welcome to coolbook.me

Concurrencies innovate 2020’s monetary markets and policies. 

https://www.amazon.com/CONCURRENCIES-Paradigm-Bitcoins-Blockchains-Non-Fungible-ebook/dp/B093XQ72FT/ 

Concurrencies cornerstone and ground foundations enriching twenty-twenty monetary markets and policies. 

First, concurrencies clarify bitcoin, blockchain and Non-Fungible token (NFT) values within virtual communities, universes, and ecosystems; that is, the exchanges where they transact. 

Bitcoins, blockchains and NFTs could and would tri-angulate value through comparable transparencies, or concurrencies. 

Super or supra exchanges could transact indexes valuing sector (e.g., energy, sports, arts), regional, national, and international bitcoin, blockchain and NFT exchange assets, values, and volumes. 

Second, concurrencies power bitcoin, blockchain and NFT conversions as Treasury reserve assets and fiat currencies. Recurrent, uneventful conversions through metaverses, those fresh spaces poised to emerge in the 2020’s integrating digital with fiat currencies, would become commonplace. Otherwise, bitcoins, NFTs and blockchains could well remain speculative and notional within virtual exchanges. 

These indispensable functionalities are equally crucial for central, large, commercial, national and community banks to sustain institutional asset values as they address and integrate technological innovation. 

Third, concurrencies ground asset values and monetary and risk values for stablecoins, those fresh digital currencies attached to the fiat currency of a nation or region or gold or another precious element.

The Known Paradigm provides all three benefits, some societal and institutional like facilitating integrations of virtual and fiat currencies, some industrial like enabling bitcoin, blockchain, stablecoin and NFT enterprises to create new asset classes and values.

In these ways, the Known Paradigm transforms cryptocurrencies to transparent risks on measurable assets from volatile bets on digital ephemera.

Its conceptual and methodological ontology creates rational calculability. Participants can reason risks of acquiring, holding, or selling any of the volatile, novel investment vehicles at any point in time. 

With adoption of Known Paradigm efficiencies and efficacies, bitcoins, blockchains and NFTs could eventually shed their precarity. 

Paradigm analytics clarify, validate, and enable the valuation of proof of sequence to complement, supplement and, potentially, to supersede proof of work and proof of stake.

This structural functionality reduces bitcoin transaction costs and expedites mining.

Because the Known Paradigm evaluates risks in contracts, bitcoins, stablecoins  and NFTs can now scale.

Bitcoins are now emerging as defensive positions potentially holding value more effectively than fiat currencies amid central bank zero lower bound interest rates and Treasury printing of currency. 

Sustainable solutions, like those embodied in KNOWN Paradigm capabilities, are now timely to rationalize bitcoin and block chain markets as digital monetary networks for assimilation with fiat currencies and monetary markets and policies in regulated markets.

Concurrency the singular or concurrencies the plural integrates prefixes “co” and “con” indicating “a joint subject” with “currency” defining “the circulating medium (whether coins or notes); the money of a country in actual use” and “concurrence” defining “combination in effecting any purpose or end, or in doing any work; co-operation of agents or causes.”  (The Oxford English Dictionary).  

Concurrencies now spawn contemporaneous instantiations of new, historically specific meanings of currency and concurrence by enabling innovator and incumbent, disruptor and storied institution, new and old, to co-exist and flourish in virtual, metaverse and fiat currency monetary markets and policies.

Amazon/Kindle distributes INTENT The Known Paradigm.

Known Paradigm information technology and digital currency innovations originate intent as a fresh network element.   

With this historic achievement, the Known Paradigm creates 21st century reciprocity. 

Because its polyhedron architecture affords vertical efficiencies without vertical hierarchies, robust individual, enterprise and institution data and meta data retail markets can emerge, thrive and multiply.  

Individuals, enterprises and institutions can now control, monetize and compensate one another for data and meta data that all create with investments, transactions and daily Internet and broadband communications. 

The monetary and risk values of any specific transaction are transparent at any point in time from origination through maturity.

Living contracts authenticate values. 

Immutable records memorialize transactions. 

Scaling and logarithmic growth create individual, enterprise and institution wealth at no marginal cost.

Technologists, investors and adopters can create standards to develop and measure the integrity and authenticity of mass-produced data and meta data for repeatable, verifiable measuring of real and near real time risk and monetary value. 

Among others, practical applications include:

-thriving individual, enterprise and institution data and meta data retail markets, 

-expediting supply chains dealing with the coronavirus pandemic by providing liquidity and clarifying risks sourcing materials and, managing logistics,

-reshoring American manufacturing by compensating parties rebuilding domestic supply chains, 

-addressing and managing tort liability, 

-animating social investment and robust, inclusive economic activity in impoverished regions, neighborhoods and communities for persons, notably urban blacks and rural poor whites, by rewarding and sustaining intentionality, the cornerstone of locally targeted economic development, and business diversity through virtuous cycles of investment and commercial activity, the opposite of boycotts forestalling income and growth, 

-empowering dominant interactive computer service incumbents like Facebook, Google and Twitter to thrive in democratic markets, curtail security costs, inoculate themselves from tort liabilities for claims of defamation, obsolesce boycotts and manage Section 230 regulatory compliance,

-equipping publishers and other information content providers with currencies, contracts and records to vend content as they wish, to whom they wish, when they wish and to regain now disintermediated advertising revenues, 

-creating industry peace by rationalizing transparency, authentication and trust across exponentially more data and meta data sources for 5G wireless, optical fiber and hybrid coaxial wireline networks and the Internet of Things animating the Fourth Industrial Revolution,

-speeding bitcoin and block chain and cryptocurrency authentication, reducing transaction costs, accelerating mining, lessening mining difficulty and innovating methods to address proof of work and proof of stake,

-grounding asset manager client best interest effecting prudent diversification for pension fund quality and quantity, 

-stabilizing next generation wholesale energy trading and rationalizing distributed generation markets, and

-clarifying risks across insurance and reinsurance products.

Artwork depicts relevance metaphorically as a Tin Lizzie and Venetian architecture and Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos as latter day Doges.

Alan Brinkley, Vannevar Bush, Henry Steele Commager, Albert Einstein, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Michel Feher, Pope Francis, John Kenneth Galbraith, Yuval Harari, Thomas S. Kuhn, Paul W. Litchfield, Gordon Moore, Thomas Piketty, John Ruskin, Claude Shannon, Robert Solow, Frederick Winslow Taylor, Soshanna Zuboff and the BIS, ECB, EU, FRB, FTC, IRS, NBER, SEC, U.S. Senate, among others, source content.

Risk expert David M. Rowe, Ph.D. contributes a foreword.

Vito Mattaliano contributes artwork and graphic design.

INTENT The Known Paradigm is dedicated to Constance & Michael Erlanger and to Michael Harold.

I am an advisor to Marketcore, a KNOWN predecessor company.

www.coolbook.me

contact  hcd@coolbook.me  

Amazon Kindle is distributing IMPEACHMENT The Shaming of the President 2020 

Alleging shame is easier than proving guilt.
 

Partisan informant is a more accurate characterization than whistleblower. An individual, who witnesses a wrong-doing and comes forward to enable a system to self-correct, is a whistleblower.
 

The informant was not a witness and remained anonymous.
 

President Trump is correcting a corrupt system, many believe.
 

Due to these infirmities, impeachment suffered fatal flaws (no eye witness; two participants, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky and Foreign Minister Vadym Prystiako, confirming President Trump’s account; informant anonymity beclouding authenticity; substitution of hearsay and supposition for evidence; forestallment of judiciary branch evaluation of the President’s executive authority claims; unauthorized subpoenas, articles inflating policy disagreements between the president and advisors as abuse of power (article 1) and legislative branch authority (article 2).
 

Partisan impeachment triggers electoral risks for Democrats. ERASE IMPEACHMENT could emerge as campaign rhetoric to flip 30 or so House districts that elected Democrats in 2018 and voted for President Trump in 2016 by appealing to voters offended by its unfairness.
 

The bitter reality that House impeachment potentially terminates President Trump’s pardons could mobilize African American voters for the president. Either by stealth or unwittingly, House Democrats may have curtailed President Trump’s pardons and reprieves. Article II Section 2 of the Constitution suggests no less: “The President… shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.” Under the First Step Act, President Trump pardons a number of African-Americans, who were convicted of non-violent narcotics violations or the 1994 Crime Act authored by then Senator Joe Biden and championed by President Bill Clinton. Virtually all rehabilitate themselves, invariably through religious devotion, affiliation and fellowship, during incarceration. “ERASE IMPEACHMENT.  President Trump sets us free” peals a liberty bell of freedom for African Americans.
 

Erasing impeachment could be the initial act of a majority Republican Congress.
 

There’s precedent. In 1837, the Senate expunged an 1834 censure of President Andrew Jackson for exceeding constitutionally delegated authority governing banking.
 

President Trump identifies with President Jackson. Erasing impeachment would give contemporaneous expression to “the people’s president.”
 

Like so much with President Trump, this is all new and historic.
 

Impeachment The Shaming of the President 2020 analyzes impeachment from start to finish.
 

The vague provenance and partisan shortcomings of House decision-making animated abuses of procedures and rules fating failure.

But, in the end, those were incidental. What mattered was an attempt to reorient public attention to the Democrat Party as one of rules, procedures and order to replace all the attention lavished on Progressive newcomers. 

And, what mattered was tarnishing and diminishing President Trump to lure swing voters in the 2020 presidential election. 

Nancy Pelosi employs impeachment to sway middle class, suburban women with rhetoric celebrating the moral authority of mothers raising children.
 

Adam Schiff triumphs as a new Nixon.
 

House Democrats insinuated parliamentary government and diminished the presidential system by blowing up a policy dispute among the president and his advisers to a constitutional crisis.
 

By branding the president with impeachment, shame powered relevance, the internal combustion engine of the contemporaneous Internet.
 

Impeachment was great constituent service, one could postulate. Nancy Pelosi represents San Francisco, the center of finance capital for networked communications, social media and information innovation. Adam Schiff represents Hollywood, the center for entertainment industries producing content for theater, broadcast, cable and wireline and wireless distributed networks. Jerrold Nadler represents the Financial District, West Side Manhattan, centers of investment, publishing, broadcasting, creative content and marketing. Their districts are home to some of the wealthiest individuals and enterprises, the 1%, whose wealth accumulates and derives from relevance. 

contact hcd@coolbook.me

Amazon/Kindle distributes PRECURSE The Thomas-Kavanaugh Spectacles. 

PRECURSE analyzes the Brett Kavanaugh and Clarence Thomas hearings for nomination to the Supreme Court.

Anita Hill came forward in 1991 after Thomas's nomination hearings had concluded with memory of alleged sexual harassment that had transpired, she asserted, eight on nine years earlier.

In 2018, after Judiciary Committee hearings evaluating Judge Kavanaugh had concluded but for voting, Christine Blasey Ford came forward with an impugning memory of alleged attempted groping and disrobing attributed to teen-aged Brett Kavanaugh by allegedly placing his hand over her mouth thirty six years earlier in the alleged encounter.

The accusation created an obligation for the Senate Judiciary Committee and the Senate to adhere to its constitutional obligations to advise and consent on judicial appointments in an unprecedented evaluation of an accusation based on uncorroborated memory as a determining factor of a nominee’s elevation to Associate Justice of the Supreme Court. 

If the allegation were an inaccurate recollection or a confabulation, Senate evaluation tested whether an inculpating, uncorroborated memory could be more damning than unalloyed truth or exculpating denial, for authenticating the veracity of allegation or denial fell beyond standards of investigation for determinations of guilt yet animated pervasive opportunities for imputations of shame. 

Whatever the veracity, it was a cunning gambit. The accusation shifted the burden of proof of innocence or guilt in connection with alleged criminal conduct to a public relations trial imputing shame well after Judge Kavanaugh had address Judiciary Committee concerns.

In this political test, Kavanaugh found that he had to reclaim his integrity, demonstrate his temperament,  prove his suitability and vindicate his political palatability in the court of public opinion yet again addressing Blasey Ford’s sullying allegation.

The allegation played out as a fruitless, delaying tactic by adversaries of Judge Kavanaugh, typified a recrudescence of Know-Nothings, the ante-bellum intolerance of Roman Catholics, in Supreme Court nomination and confirmation as a contemporaneous correlative to the anti-Semitism that Justice Louis D. Brandeis foresuffered more than one hundred years ago.  

PRECURSE presents analysis of Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s textualist jurisprudence and observes women’s empowerment.

The Internet embodied a crucial difference between the Thomas spectacle and the Kavanaugh spectacle. The earlier spectacle was substantially in the newspapers and on television and radio mediated by journalists and editors.

The Kavanaugh spectacle transpired over broadband wireline and wireless networks and fixed and mobile communications devices and displays mediated by anyone who wished to participate. 

In both instances, the spectacles represent significant revenue generation opportunities for dominant firms across networking, social media and journalism.

Pornography and obscenity emerge as particularly serviceable vehicles for the Hill accusations and for Kavanaugh allegations.  

For all the ultimately gratuitous sullying, the Blasey Ford accusations advanced the public interest by enabling citizens to evaluate the integrity of the Justice and the provenance and stengths and weakesses of the besmirching allegations.   

If, however, Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination had collapsed due to being “credibly accused” of conduct without authenticating the veracity of accusations in absences of any corroborating testimony or evidence, coming forward with uncorroborated memory, complemented by other unverifiable memories or baseless accusations,  that failure would have undermined the public interest by encouraging meritless allegations vitiating the presumption of guilt, due process and governance. 

But, those concerns were incidental. Shame trumped guilt.

Senator Diane Feinstein’s deft politics helped her defeat a dynamic, young Progressive challenger by attracting votes of older women.

The spectacle made for impelling television and boosted business volumes for California  interactive computer service and communications oligopolies, Alphabet/Google, Apple, Facebook, Twitter. 

The spectacle merits evaluation as a skirmish in ongoing campaigns of empowerment,  misandry and religious intolerance contesting Supreme Court appointments.  

contact hcd@coolbook.me